Vray vs Corona: Interior Render Comparison
There is much attention around a pretty new render engine: Corona.A lot of users are migrating from vray to corona render,due to it’s simplicity & mixed biased/unbiased physically accurate render engine.
So in this article, we will be making a comparison between these two popular render engines-Corona vs Vray.
There are a lot of contenders to take the crown of the best render engine for architectural renders, nowadays There is a lot of hype around corona vs vray. It seems the King(vray) is loosing many users because of the rise of Corona render.
Corona Render
Corona render deliver high quality, physically based shading in production rendering its features are integrated into Autodesk 3ds Max. Corona render born around 2012 as a “proudly CPU based render engine”. It supports both unbiased path tracing and biased UHD cache to deliver a pretty fast but very accurate GI results. It has a stand-alone frame buffer where you can tweak your renders until they are completely clean (Corona uses the Progressive render mode).
Vray Render
V-Ray is probably the most famous and used render engine nowadays. It is developed by Chaos Group, a Bulgarian company in 1997. V-Ray is used in media, entertainment, and design industries such as movie, industrial and product design, video games and architecture. It can use traditional biased Raytracing (global illumination, photon mapping) or Brute Force unbiased algorithms. You can use V-Ray with almost any 3d software. V-ray also has its own GPU render engine (V-Ray RT).
Conclusion
It is clear that V-Ray with numerous resources, a wide range of support for 3D software, a massive list of extensive settings as well as its higher bias based rendering speed and its ability to also render simultaneously on a GPU and CPU setup makes it a favorite option for the rendering market. Nonetheless, this doesn’t make Corona any less useful. In spite of the fact that it is new in the market, it presents a higher rendering speed in an Un-Biased rendering.